THE GALLON ENVIRONMENT LETTER
Canadian
Institute for Business and the Environment
Fisherville,
Ontario, Canada
Tel. 416
410-0432, Fax: 416 362-5231
Vol. 16, No. 10, February 28, 2012
****************************************************
This is the honoured reader
edition of the Gallon Environment Letter and is distributed at no charge: send a
note with Add GL or Delete GL in the subject line to
subscriptions@gallonletter.ca. Subscribers receive a more complete edition
without subscription reminders and with extensive links to further information
following almost every article. Organizational subscriptions are $184 plus
HST/GST and provide additional benefits detailed on the web site. Individual
subscriptions are only $30 (personal emails/funds only please) including HST. If
you would like to subscribe please visit http://www.cialgroup.com/subscription.htm If you feel you should be receiving the paid subscriber edition or have
other subscriber questions please contact us also at subscriptions@gallonletter.ca. This
current free edition is posted on the web site about a week or so after its
issue at http://www.cialgroup.com/whatsnew.htm. Back free editions from January 2009 are also
available.
****************************************************
ABOUT THIS
ISSUE
This editorial in this issue reviews the
Harper government's attitude towards the environment and makes some suggestions
for where we can all go from here. One place to go is industry leadership of
environmental initiatives and, with that in mind, we list some of the more
significant environmental awards that are available to Canadian companies. Being
among those that are convinced that positive action for the environment needs to
become a matter of competition among companies, we urge our corporate readers to
compete for some of the many awards that are available. It will almost certainly
improve your environmental and economic performance. To make reading interesting
for our individual readers our awards summary also presents some of the most
recent winners and their achievements.
We suspect that some readers view awards with
some scepticism. Given the limited resources often provided to judges, we are
not surprised that recipients are sometimes not as worthy as the award suggests.
However, there are also some awards designed to highlight the infamous. Our list
would not be complete without our mentioning these.
In other news and views, we welcome two
Letters to the Editor in this issue (please send more to editor@gallonletter.ca), we include some advice on environmental insurance
policies, and we report on the new status of the founder of the World Business
Council on Sustainable Development. The Royal Ontario Museum has an exhibition
on the collapse of the Mayan civilization and leads us to ponder on the
possibility of similarities between that situation and today's situation in some
parts of the world. We explore whether the US National Parks Service is
encouraging people to consume more heavily sugared beverages and we analyse the
message of a recent book that explores methods of thinking.
Our next issue will contain GallonLetter's
reporting from the recent Energy, Utility and Environment Conference held in
Phoenix, Arizona, last month.
****************************************************
HARPER GOVERNMENT MAY BE RISKING ENVIRONMENTAL
BACKLASH
Many industry leaders could attest as to how
working with environmental groups and social responsibility critics,
substantially reducing confrontation, is a far more effective strategy than
engaging the community of critics in battle. That is a lesson that they might do
well to convey to the Harper government. Harper's pugnacious approach toward
citizens who see the environment as more important than does his government will
almost certainly result in more confrontation, increased intervention by US and
overseas environmental groups, more boycotts of Canadian products, and greater
difficulty in working with other countries, most likely including Europe but
possible also the US and Asian trade partners. No country wants to do business
with a partner that is seen to be destroying environmental resources of global
significance.
Despite attempts by Environment Minister Peter
Kent to reassure Canadians that the government is not against all
environmentalists, only those that are against Canada's economic priorities, the
evidence suggests that the Harper government really has no truck with
environmental policies. Early in its first mandate, funds previously granted to
environmental groups were slashed. Funding to the Canadian Environment Network,
a group that facilitated communication between the federal government and
environmental groups, and hence benefitted the government to a considerable
extent, were eliminated. The National Round Table on the Environment and the
Economy has been marginalized and few would be surprised if its funding is
eliminated in an upcoming budget. Funding for Sustainable Development Technology
Canada, one of the few quasi-government initiatives working to support greening
of industry through support to sustainable technologies, was delayed and
slashed. The government has stated that it will change the Environmental
Assessment Act to reduce the length of hearings and, implicitly, reduce the
number of issues that can be addressed and potentially the number of
interveners. Nothing useful is happening on the climate change front and the
government has attempted, unsuccessfully, to avoid international censure by
withdrawing from the Kyoto Protocol. In the early days of its first mandate the
Harper government promised to harmonize Canada's climate change rules with those
of the United states but now that the US is taking action on some environmental
issues even this pledge seems to have been set aside. Environmental initiative
after initiative is stalled within Health Canada, Environment Canada, Natural
Resources Canada, and elsewhere inside government. Ministers and backbenchers
have recently taken to attacking environmental and social responsibility groups,
often using incorrect information to support their case.
Virtually all of Canada's environmental laws
and regulations were introduced by Conservative governments. There is nothing
traditionally anathema between conservatives and the environment. Many of those
who vote Conservative, citizens, corporate donors, and foundations, also support
environmental initiatives. There is no evidence to indicate that conservatism
and conservation have separated, though GallonLetter does accept that the
extreme right wing of the Conservative Party of Canada shares Prime Minister
Harper's strong dislike of many things environmental. However, the extreme right
is very unlikely to be a large enough cohort to re-elect a Harper majority
government in 2015.
Both the environment and Canada's
international reputation are important to Canadians. Both are threatened if the
Harper government continues on its present anti-environment trajectory. Maybe
the government is planning a big environmental push in 2014, ahead of the next
election, but if so some public consultation should already be underway. The
risk of the present strategy is not only that environment may become an election
issue in 2015 but that funding, support, environmental activism, and outside
attacks on the self-image of Canadians may become more and more real as 2015
approaches. If President Obama is re-elected this Fall, as seems increasingly
likely, criticism of Canada's lack of environmental progress may even come from
the US administration.
The problem, in our opinion, rests not only
with the Harper government but also with environmental activists and business
leaders who continue to stress an old paradigm: that the environment is best
protected and improved through government regulation and marketplace control.
Today more and more jurisdictions are demonstrating that the environment and the
economy do go hand in hand and that one of the best ways, if not the only way,
to a sustainable economy is through protection of the environment. Clearly the
Harper government is not especially enthusiastic about increased regulation of
industry but is more likely to be interested in initiatives which enhance
Canada's competitiveness and grow our economy. Without expecting all to agree,
we urge Canada's environmental leaders to enhance promotion of the positive role
of green business in providing jobs and economic well-being for decades into the
future.
GallonLetter will be exploring these
opportunities in greater detail through the balance of this year.
Colin Isaacs
Editor
PS. For one example of environmental groups
and industry working together in a potentially successful way, visit
GallonDaily.com and scroll down to: Environmentalists agree to offset plan from
fertilizer giant.
****************************************************
****************************************************
CORPORATE
AWARDS AND RECOGNITION
****************************************************
The following is a directory of national and
major regional environmental awards and recognition programs that are available
to Canadian companies. It isn’t complete. If you are aware of an award which we
have missed, please email details to us at editor@gallonletter.ca
We will include an update in a future issue.
We will also be posting a list of award programs on the GallonLetter website
later in the year and for this would welcome details of local as well as
regional, national and international awards.
****************************************************
GLOBE AWARDS
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE
Ms. Carine Vindeirinho, Director,
International Relations, Coordinator, GLOBE Awards wrote to us about the GLOBE
Awards for Environmental Excellence, an set of awards which we already consider
to be the most high profile in Canada, "The deadline for application in our 2012
edition just closed but people might still be interested in finding out who the
finalists and winners will be. Finalists will be announced Feb 27 and winners
will be announced on Mar 16 in a ceremony held during the GLOBE 2012 Closing
Luncheon.
For information about award categories for the
2012 edition, past winners and important dates, please visit www.theglobeawards.ca GLOBE Headquarters: is in Vancouver, BC where Globe 2012
will be held March 14-15, 2012 at the Vancouver Convention Centre. http://www.globeseries.com "
This year's judging panel consists
of:
- Mike Harcourt, Former Vancouver Mayor; Former
BC Premier; Chairman, QUEST, Victoria, BC
- Denis Leclerc, President & CEO, Écotech
Québec, Montreal, QC
- Melanie Nadeau, Senior Manager,
Sustainability, Emera, Halifax, NS
- Mark Rudolph, President, justenvironment,
Campbellville, ON
- Laura Selanders, Senior Manager,
Environmental Stewardship & Sustainability, The Home Depot, Toronto,
ON
The 2011 award winners were:
The Corporate Award for Environmental
Excellence - Walmart Canada
The Award for Best Green Consumer Product -
Tetra Pak Canada Inc.
The Award for Best Green Consumer Product -
Honorary Small Business Award -
Mariclaro Canada Inc.
The Award for Best Green Retailing Practices -
The Beer Store
The Award for Technology Innovation and
Application -
Ostara Nutrient Recovery Technologies Inc.
(see separate article)
The Award for Excellence in Urban
Sustainability - BC Housing Management Commission
****************************************************
ONTARIO
BUSINESS ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS
The Ontario Chamber of Commerce deadline for
Ontario Business Achievement Awards is June 1, 2012. The OBAAs turn 30 this year
over which time there have been 300 OBAA winners. A number of the categories
could apply to corporate responsibility such as the ICAO Award for Governance or
the Innovation Award. Both the Desjardins Award for Large Business and the RBC
Royal Bank Award for Small Business mention environmental stewardship and
corporate citizenship as an aspect of winning. Both are available to two
businesses each.
The Ontario Global Traders Award is a
partnership with the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation in
recognizing small and medium sized private sector for profit companies who
export. Again there is nothing to stop a company with good environmental
practices to win but there are no specific environmental criteria listed in the
overview.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
ALBERTA:
EMERALD AWARDS
The Emerald Foundation receives nominations in
ten categories relating to environment for the Emerald Awards which open in
November and close at the end of February. The 2012 award categories recognize
youth, community group, education (school or classroom), public education &
outreach (available to individuals, organizations and local initiatives outside
the formal education system), not-for-profit associations, large and small
businesses, individual and governments.
The Emerald Certified - Shared Footprints
Award launched in 2010 by Alberta Sustainable Resource Development must meet the
standards for the Emerald Awards and the eight principles of Integrated Land
Management. It is presented by Encana.
The Emerald Challenge Award is on a topic set
by the Board of Directors on a topic of current importance to the well being of
the Alberta Environment. In 2012, the theme is Alberta's Oil Sands presented by
Alberta Energy. It is open in individuals, groups, businesses and
government.
This year the 21st Annual Emerald Award will
be held June 6, 2012 in Calgary.
****************************************************
CANADIAN
CONSULTING ENGINEERING AWARDS
The 2012 Canadian Consulting Engineering
Awards are a joint project of the Canadian Consulting Engineer CCE magazine and
the Association of Consulting Engineering Companies (ACEC).
The awards are processed in several stages.
Stage 1 deadline application and a $300 entry fee (fees are common in a number
of the awards) are due March 27, 2012. The awards are presented at an awards
gala dinner to be held in Ottawa in November 1, 2012.
The highest honour is the Schreyer Award
(named for former Governor General Ed S.) which is for the best demonstration of
technical excellence. While not overtly an environmental award, some of the
winners have demonstrated technical excellence in regard to the environment.
Tree for Life Award was inaugurated in 2008 and is specifically for outstanding
environmental stewardship in projects selected from all the other award
categories.
Like many of the corporate awards, the press
release promotes the idea of the value such as winner of the award meeting with
high-ranking parliamentarians, being recognized in a special issue of the
Canadian Consulting Engineer magazine along with press releases such as to the
local area of the winners. Winners are also encouraged to invite their Member of
Parliament to the Gala and to submit display boards on their companies at the
award event.
Schreyer
Award: Genivar Inc.
Genivar Inc.(Murdochville, QC ) won the
Schreyer Award in 2011 for the $116 million and four years of site work to
decommission the Gaspe Mines for Xstrata Copper Canada said to be the first
smelter decommissioning project and the largest mining and metallurgical site
closure in Canada. As well as on-site remediation, off site cleanup was done at
over 800 homes, commercial and industrial properties in the town of Murdochville
and Sandy Beach area affected by airborne pollutants from the smelting
operations and copper concentrate handling in boats and trains over 50
years.
Tree for Life:
Enermodal Engineering
The Tree for Life Award was won by Enermodal
Engineering Ltd.(Kitchener, ON) for its own headquarters in Kitchener which uses
82% less energy than a conventional office. Their HQ uses a metered 69 kWh/m2
compared with the Canadian average of 384 kWh/m2.
Enermodal is in the business of creating green
buildings and communities and has worked on 110 LEED certified projects half of
which have achieved gold or platinum level.
A company press release in November announced
the building called A Grander View, "has become the first LEED Canada triple
Platinum building with certifications in the New Construction (NC), Commercial
Interiors (CI), and Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance
(EB:O&M) rating systems. This is also the first ever LEED Canada EB:O&M
Platinum certified project.
GallonLetter notes that the LEED's Operations
and Management rating applies only to buildings which have been in operation for
at least a year and requires renewal every five years. The rating helps address
one of the problems with green buildings (and indeed almost all infrastructure)
, failure to keep it in good shape or to prevent and repair damage can lead to
buildings which fail to meet energy and environmental expectations associated
with LEED certification.
Enermodal:
Other Awards
The high standard of the building has garnered
other awards including
- America's Most Livable Building: 2011 Livable
Building
- Award from the Center for the Built
Environment (CBE) at the University of California,
- An Urban Design award in the low rise office
category from the City of Kitchener. Some of the features recognized include a
5 cubic metre rainwater cistern for toilet flushing, extension of a community
trail along the property, native species and pesticide free landscaping,
daylighting sensors, 5.5 kW rooftop PV-supplied power and a narrow footprint
so all occupants have views of the outdoors.
- Healthy Workplace Award at the Gold level
from the Region of Waterloo’s Project Health initiative. As well as the
building features recognized were, Enermodal’s flex time policies, employee
garden plots, organic/local food purchasing policies, and bike
storage/showers.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
ENERGY STAR
MARKET TRANSFORMATION AWARDS: CALL FOR NOMINATIONS
A press release sent for Dianna Miller, Chief,
Equipment Labelling Program, Office of Energy Efficiency at Natural Resources
Canada, states,
"We are now accepting nominations for the 2012
ENERGY STAR Market Transformation Awards. The deadline to submit a nomination is
March 14, 2012. (Please note that, unlike in previous years, this is a fixed
deadline that will not be extended.)
The award categories are:
a) ENERGY STAR Manufacturer of the Year:
Single product or multiple products
b) ENERGY STAR Retailer of the Year: National
or regional
c) ENERGY STAR Advocates: Utilities (large or
local), Distributors, or General Promoters (including governments or
non-governmental organizations)
Nominees in each category will be assessed
using the 5As of Market Transformation: Acceptance, Accessibility,
Affordability, Availability and Awareness. Each category has additional
assessment criteria, over and above the Five A’s, that are used to select
winner. More information is available on our Web site. Winners will be announced
on June 5th during the 2012 ENERGY STAR Participants' Meeting, to be held at the
Fairmont Château Laurier hotel in Ottawa, Ontario.
If you would like more information on these
awards, or to submit a nomination, contact Nancy Fecteau by phone at 613
996-3768 or by e-mail nfecteau[ ]nrcan.gc.ca. "
CARBON
DISCLOSURE PROJECT: LEADERS INDEX CDLI
The top 10% of companies of the 2011 Canadian
200 companies published by the Carbon Disclosure Project Canada are recognized
in the CDP Canada Leaders Index for their transparency in releasing both their
strategy and emissions. Ranked by their carbon disclosure are:
Suncor Energy Inc
Newmont Mining Corporation
Bank of Montreal
Barrick Gold Corporation
Canadian National Railway Company
Stantec Inc.
TMX Group Inc.
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers
Incorporated
Cenovus Energy Inc.
Boliden Group
ARC Resources Ltd.
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
Emera Inc.
BCE Inc.
Kinross Gold Corporation
Encana Corporation
Royal Bank of Canada
Yamana Gold Inc.
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
(CIBC)
National Bank of Canada
In the introduction to the 2011 report on the
Carbon Disclosure Project in Canada, David McLaughlin, President and CEO of the
National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy wrote, "So, we have a
collective stake in getting global emissions down. As we do so, Canada can lead
in low-carbon economic performance, clean energy technology development and
business adaptation to climate change.
The numbers are in. CDP shows Canadian
businesses are starting to do just that."
McLaughlin's observation may be spot on -
Canadian businesses are starting towards greenhouse gas emissions
reduction and reporting. The report says, "The range of scores for the 2011 CDLI
is 69 to 92 with an average CDLI score of 77. This is significantly lower than
that
of the Global 500, which ranges from 90 to 99
with an average score of 94. The range of scores in the full respondent sample
is very wide – running from 10 to 92 with a few companies in every sector
scoring below 40, indicating that not all companies are equally advanced in
their climate change reporting."
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
EDC: SUCCESS
STORIES FOR CANADIAN EXPORTING COMPANIES
Highlighting of a company's success under a
specific program is also a form of recognition both of the company and the
organization running the program. For example, EDC's Knowledge Centre which is
intended to help Canadian companies to export their products and services has a
section called "Success Stories." One story is about Catalyst Paper (Richmond,
BC) described as Canada's largest producer of quality paper and pulp products.
About 90% of their product is exported. The company has reduced its greenhouse
gas emissions by 70% since 1990. Its export business is insured through EDC's
Accounts Receivable Insurance.
Economic Development Canada EDC is Canada’s
export credit agency, "offering innovative commercial solutions to help Canadian
exporters and investors expand their international business."
****************************************************
MACLEANS TOP
50 SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE CORPORATIONS
The Top 50 Socially Responsible Companies in
Canada were based on tracking of their environmental, social and governance
indicators by a broad range of environmental, social, and governance (ESG)
indicators tracked by Jantzi-Sustainalytics.
Among reasons given for selection to Maclean's
list are winning other awards. For example:
3M: Energy Star Sustained Award given for the
company's global energy conservation.
Brookfield Office Properties Inc: Sustainable
Corporate Real Estate Roundtable's "Outstanding Landlord of the Year
2010."
The company's Queen's Quay terminal building
won the 2010 BOMA (Building Owners and Managers Association of Canada) Toronto
Earth Award and the 2010 BOMA National Earth award for resource preservation and
environmentally sound commercial building management
TransAlta: President and CEO Steve Snyder
(since retired and replaced in January 2012 with Chief Operating Officer Dawn
Farrell) was named the 2010 Canadian Energy Person of the Year by the Energy
Council of Canada for leadership in corporate social responsibility and
environmental sustainability. TransAlta was also named one of the 15 Carbon
Disclosure Project leaders in Canada for transparency on greenhouse gas
emissions and climate change strategy.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
GREEN LIVING
ECR
Excellence in Corporate Responsibility Awards
by Green Living Enterprises was launched in 2011. Last year’s event was at the
Toronto Toronto’s TIFF Bell Lightbox, October 26th, an event
GallonLetter’s editor attended. The tribute and The Outstanding Achievement
Award to late Ray Anderso, CEO of Interface, Inc. was a highlight to many in the
audience.
Among the other 2011 winners were Cenovus
Energy Inc., Cascades, LoyaltyOne Inc., Canadian Tire Corporation, Steam Whistle
Brewing, Lanefab Design/Build, The Greater Toronto CivicAction Alliance, and TD
Bank Financial Group.
Judges include Kelly Baxter of The Natural
Step, Valérie Bécaert of CIRAIG, Heather Lang of
Jantzi-Sustainalytics, Bob Willard, author and
speaker on corporate sustainability and Matt McCulloch of the Pembina
Institute.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
CATIE AWARDS:
GREENING OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN
The Canadian Association of Importers and
Exporters Catie Awards are presented as part of the annual trade show and
conference. Various awards are available for application. The application form
for the Greening of the Supply Chain states, "This award recognizes a Canadian
company that has initiated, implemented and proven corporate commitment to the
greening of the supply chain and reducing their carbon footprint. Candidates
include any Canadian importer, exporter,
service provider, transportation company, distributor or manufacturer. Companies
do not need to be a member of I.E.Canada in order to be eligible for this
award."
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
CANADIAN AWARD
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION
The Royal Canadian Geographical Society and 3M
established the Canadian Award for Environmental Innovation for individuals from
business, government, academia or community organizations. The award is for
projects, programs or initiatives that provide innovative solutions that
protect, restore or preserve the environment. Nominations are due by August 31,
2012.
In 2011, the winner was Michel Séguin, who is
an independent Canadian Tire dealer in Laval, Quebec. He founded an Environment
Committee which set up a program at some stores in Quebec to take back used
automotive oil for proper disposal beginning in 1992. In 2010, the Go Eco
program was adopted at 98 Canadian Tire stores in Quebec to help increase
customer awareness of how important it is to recycle and properly deal with
automotive products such as antifreeze, batteries, oil filters and plastic oil
bottles. The Canadian Tire automotive centres are also involved in the Go Eco
program.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
MEDIA CORP:
CANADA'S GREENEST EMPLOYERS
Canada's Greenest Employers are evaluated for
their unique environmental programs, for their reduction of environmental
footprint, the degree to which employees are involved and the extent to which
the employer has a green public identity and whether that attracts people to the
organization.
The application is through Canada's Top 100
Employers application process which includes an application fee. There are other
categories such as provincial tops, city tops e.g. Greater Toronto Top
Employers, and Canada's Best Diversity Employer
The 2012 winners will be announced in the
Globe and Mail on April 20, 2012 just ahead of Earth Day.
Each of the winners has a web page at Eluta, a
job and career web site operated by the Media Corp, giving a list of the reasons
for the win for that year.
Some examples of reasons include product
options which GallonLetter's Editor has particular interest in especially as he
serves as science advisor for one of the winners. Examples of green products
include:
The Home Depot Canada
- Eco-options products such as solar panels,
compact fluorescent light bulbs and green cleaning products.
- Replaced harmful pesticides and herbicides
with environmentally preferable alternatives before provincial legislation
such as in Ontario required it.
- Programs to educate employees and consumers
on environmental products such as "Go Low Flow" toilets and "Mow Down
Pollution" electric or people-powered lawnmowers and the "SLED" Christmas
lights which exchanges conventional lights with LED.
Georgian College
- As part of an aggressive paper use reduction
program, has recycled old paper intro "Trashy Notes" sold in the campus
bookstore with profits used to finance student greening initiatives.
- Offers courses at the Centre for Sustainable
Technologies for skilled trades and other programs.
HP
- Has new technologies which shut down to
reduce phantom power use.
Ikea
-
Announced it would phase out
incandescent bulbs selling only low energy bulbs.
- Monitors suppliers of wood products to ensure
sources are legal and not from intact natural forests. Aims to in the long
term source only from certified Forest Stewardship Council certified
sources.
- Coffee is UTZ Certified intended to protect
workplace health and safety, provide healthcase, housing and schools and
reduced environmental impacts.
Loblaw
- Building of 20 years of President's Choice
Green products, added five new Green label products for a total of 44 green
products.
- Promotes local produce during July and
August
- Collects plastic flower pots and flats for
recycling into pots and flats used in Loblaw garden centres.
- Introduced new Fair Trade certified and a
Sustainable Seafood Commitment.
Loyalty One
- Iintroduced a line of environmental products
"My Planet" brand which means customers can redeem Air Miles for 100
environmentally preferable products.
Mars Canada
- Will source all its cacao from the Rainforest Alliance
certified producers by 2020
New Flyer
- Advocates for mass transit including new bus
designs
- Is working with a partner called Mini-Hybrid
Thermal Cooling System for diesel and natural gas engines
- Supplied hydrogen buses to the 2010 Olympics
in Vancouver.
SAS Canada
- Developed a Sustainability Management
software to help clients track the triple bottom line: people, profit and the
planet
TD
- Introduced green financial products including
environmentally focussed investment fund, reduced rates for mortgages and
lines of credit for qualified energy efficient homes and equipment and special
MicroFIT financing for energy products eligible for the Ontario Power
Authority programs.
Greenest
Employers Recognize Employees
The Fairmont Hotels & Resorts recognizes
individual employees who compete for "EnviroStar of the Year" for outstanding
contribution to the company's sustainability goals.
At Toyota, if employees make environmental
suggestions that are implemented, they get eco-points which become donations to
the Toyota Nature Centre at the Shades Mill Conservation area.
The Environmental Excellence program at the
Regional Municipality of Waterloo recognizes individual employees who reduce
their environmental footprint at work; they receive a certificate showing that a
tree has been planted in their name to a local conservation
authority.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
EMPLOYERS: THE
GREEN 30
Macleans magazine's The Green 30 is based on
employee responses about their employers environmental efforts. The 2011 list
compiled by Aon Hewitt includes:
- Delta Hotels and Resorts
- McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Ltd.
- Stikeman Elliott, LLP
- Whole Foods Markets
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
NEWALTA:
CONFERENCES AND RECOGNITION
In the 2011 Sustainability report, Newalta
discusses participation in industry association conferences as a reputation
builder. For example, participation in the Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters
association conference on Sustainable Manufacturing Summit, sponsorship and
organization assistance to the Canadian Institute of Planners' Climate Change +
Communities event and presentation to the EI Hazardous Waste Digest Gathering in
San Diego on industrial waste management.
Other recognitions include:
Outstanding Business Achievement Award (Sarnia
Chamber of Commerce)
Services to local refinery and chemical
industry customers to reclaim value from waste and reduce environmental
impacts.
Rio Tinto Alcan launched the BRAVO awards in
2010. Newalta was one of six suppliers winning for helping the mining giant
reduce hazardous waste sent to landfill.
****************************************************
SAP: IT GREEN
AWARDS
SAP, the business software company
headquartered in Germany with a presence in Canada with the largest number of
employees in Vancouver, lists recognition of its Sustainability Performance with
the following:
FTSE4Good (TSE is an independent company
owned by the London Stock Exchange Group)
Dow Jones Sustainability Index
Global Challenges Index (1)
This is a Hannover Stock Exchange index. The
seven global challenges of the GCX are:
- combatting the causes and consequences of
climate change
- securing adequate provision of drinking
water
- stopping deforestation
- preserving biodiversity
- dealing with population development
- combatting poverty
- supporting responsible governance
structures
Apparently GCX have increased value for
investors more than some of the other German and European indexes.
Global 100 (Corporate Knights Inc. and
Innovest Strategic Value Advisors ranking)
NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability 50
Index
Oekom Prime Rating
Oekom rated 205 companies from the Information
Technology (IT) sector against a range of environmental and social
criteria.
GreenIT Best Practice AWARD 2010
2010 Greenbang Award for the best corporate
responsibility project
Nomination for the German Sustainability Award
in the category “Most sustainable strategy”
Inclusion in the Greenpeace Cool IT
Leaderboard
Inclusion in the Ethibel PIONEER and Ethibel
EXCELLENCE Investment Registers
Short-listed in the 2010 Ceres-ACCA
Sustainability Reporting Awards
Note (1) Recently one of the companies was
delisted due to be taken over by Warren Buffet and removed from the stock
exchange. the Canadian National Railway became GCX listed.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
CANADIAN
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS: REPORTING AWARDS
The CICA awards are by sector and then there
are also special judging categories which have specific environmental
features:
Suncor Energy Inc. was the 2011 winner in the
Sustainable Development Reporting Award of Excellence and TELUS Corporation for
the Sustainable Development Reporting Award Honourable Mention.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
CASCADES
Cascades has won a number of awards and been
runner up or finalist in other contests some of which the company web site also
mentioned. Founded in 1964, Cascades produces, converts and markets packaging
and tissue products that are composed mainly of recycled fibres.
A few of these awards are:
The Corporate Social Responsibility Award for
exemplary practices in social responsibility from Corporate and Community Social
Responsibility conference held in November at Algonquin College. Respect for the
environment is one of the features as well as relations to
stakeholders.
:
A barometer of responsible consumption,
ranking both brands and companies by the consumer group Protégez-Vous in the
province of Quebec.. The companies are listed as:
1 Cascades
2 Hydro-Québec
3 Lavo (La Parisienne)
4 Loblaw (Le Choix du Président)
5 Desjardins
6 Canadian Tire
7 Walmart
8 Procter & Gamble
9 Metro
10 Vidéotron
Excellence in Corporate Responsibility Awards
by Green Living Enterprises (see separate article)
Sustainable
Supplier Award
Cascades announced its third Sustainable
Supplier Award on January 31, 2012 that Henkel and BASF won the contest which
acknowledges the commitment of suppliers towards sustainable development. The
award recognizes both the efforts of suppliers for their positive impact on
production methods and manufacturing and on the environmental, social and
economic impact.
Recognition of suppliers is a growing trend
although not so many of these type of awards are specific to the environment or
sustainability.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
ENCANA: AN
ENERGY COMPANY AWARD SUCCESS STORY
Canadian energy company Encana's web site
lists awards and rankings over the last few years, some received one time and
others annually. Moving up in rankings is mentioned to highlight
progress.
Collaborative Research Award part of the
Natural Resource Forum in BC
Encana supported a research project undertaken
by the University of Northern British Columbia, Environmental Dynamics Inc., and
Prophet River First Nation, to study and record information on traditional
plants from the Prophet River First Nation elders and knowledge
holders.
2012 Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations
list (Corporate Knights)
Best 50 Corporate Citizens (Corporate
Knights)
Encana notes it was only one of two oil and
gas companies to be in the top 20 rankings.
Responsible Canadian Energy (Canadian
Association of Petroleum Producers)
The award was joint with Apache Canada for the
first of its kind water treatment plant, the Debolt facility in northern BC; it
treats non-potable water from an aquifer to reduce surface water use by the
companies' fracking operation.
World's Most Ethical Companies (Ethisphere™
Institute)
Of the more than 100 companies on the list,
Encana was one of only two Canadian companies to make this list. The company
scored on: ethics and compliance; reputation, leadership and innovation;
governance; and corporate citizenship and responsibility.
Dow Jones Sustainability World
Index
and in 2011 the Silver Class distinction
in the 2011 Sustainability Yearbook issued by SAM Sustainable Asset Management
(a DJ listing)
EPA Report on
Fracking in Wyoming
The good news of awards for the reputation can
be offset by other events and issues. At times the award itself becomes an
issue: for both the company and the award giver e.g. when a company is sued for
environmental damage or is found negligent in the death of one or more workers.
Watch groups tend to use headlines such as Award winning company charged with
pollution.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
released a report under Superfund late last year linking polluted drinking water
at least partly due to Encana's hydraulic fracturing aka fracking in Wyoming.
Encana has challenged the scientific basis of the draft study which is subject
to peer review. Shale gas extraction is becoming a source of controversy giving
natural gas a bad environmental name. Of the fossil fuels, natural gas has been
said to be a cleaner fuel. The EPA research report is specific to Pavillion,
Wyoming. The public comment on the draft report ends March 12,
2012.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
SELECTION OF
OTHER AWARDS
Recycling
Councils
A number of the provincially-based recycling
councils have environment awards. For example, the Recycling Council of British
Columbia will host the 38th Annual Zero Waste Conference and Exhibit in Whistler
BC from May 23-25, 2012.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
Municipally-based Awards
City of Toronto with Green Living Enterprises
has categories which include a specific Green Business award as well as
awards on themes such as local food, energy conservation, green
design, environmental leadership and water efficiency.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
Centre for
Excellence in CSR
The Centre for Excellence in CSR is being
developed by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum CIM, a
professional society, as part of “as one of the 4 pillars of the Canadian
government's action plan on CSR, Building the Canadian Advantage, announced in
March 2009.” Among its aims are to raise the bar for corporate responsibility
for Canadian extractive companies. Lack of action on that front has been the
source of criticism by the Opposition of the federal agency Extractive Sector
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Counsellor.
On its web site is a list of awards available
and won by mining companies both general awards and specific to the mining
sectors. For example, the Mining Association of Canada has a Sustainability
Award. Links to the award web pages are also provided.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
Industry
Sector Specific Awards
Some awards are specific to a sector. The Pulp
and Paper International Awards are sponsored by RISI an information provider for
the global forest products industry. Domtar in Canada won for Environmental
Strategy of the Year Award and the award Promotional Campaign of the Year -
Environmental Message for its PAPERbecause marketing campaign.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
Regionally
Specific Awards
Atlantic Business magazine has awards for 50
CEOs and CSR. Its 2011 CSR award winners were announced in November 2011 in
three categories: Philanthropy/Community Outreach, Human Resources and
Sustainability. Organizations must have headquarters in Atlantic Canada or have
a regional/provincial office which has significant decision-making autonomy. The
awards are divided further by number of employees (26 to 100; 101 to 500 and
over 500 employees). Each award tells "why they stand out".
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
SUCCESS
STORIES: OSTARA NUTRIENT RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Recognition can also happen via good stories
about technical innovations created by the company. With the support of
the National Research Council Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC-IRAP),
Ostara's technology was originally created at the University of British
Columbia. It is a wastewater treatment system which removes phosphorus and
nitrogen from municipal wastewater and makes a fertilizer for sale called
Crystal Green ® . The NRC success story says this is "a process that is good for
the planet, good for agriculture and saves money for municipalities. The company
has seen growth of 50-10% per year for a number of years.
The company operated a pilot plant in Edmonton
and built a full scale demonstration project at Edmonton's wastewater treatment
plant in 2007. It also built nutrient recovery plants in three U.S.
municipalities, will build the first Canadian commercial plant in Saskatoon and
expects to begin construction on a facility in London, UK in 2012.
Excess nitrogen and phosphorus running into
marine and lake environments deplete oxygen and kills fish at the same time that
phosphorus is a non-renewable resource that is key to food production. The slow
release feature of Crystal Green®) means that the nutrients fertilize the crops
instead of running off.
Ostara has won some other awards including the
Globe one previously mentioned:
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
PUBLIC EYE:
(IN)FAMOUS AWARDS
Not all awards recognize responsibility.
Greenpeace International and World Development recognize what they consider they
consider the worst examples of corporate irresponsibility of companies which are
members of the World Economic Forum.
Barclays bank was named for being "the
fastest-growing food speculator in the world" accused of driving up food prices
so that millions of people who must spend a large portion of their income on
food are pushed into extreme poverty.
The Public Eye People's Award is web-based.
The most votes (over 25,000 votes) went to Vale, the world's second largest
mining company based in Brazil and which in Canada took over Inco. A recent
reason for the vote was given as the construction of the Belo Monte Dam in the
Amazon which is said to harm indigeneous populations as well as plants and
animals.
The press release calls for countries,
particularly Switzerland where the World Economic Forum is held, to legally
require companies from that country to comply with human rights and
environmental standards.
The World
Economic Forum
World political leaders attend the Davos
business conference and even sometimes reach agreements on international issues
but essentially The World Economic Forum is a group of businesses. Nothing wrong
with that except if people lose sight of that fact. The foundation which runs
the conference says it aims for non-partisanship but that is an unlikely
scenario as its members are 1000 companies who become members by invitation only
and for the most part evidently have to have revenues of over 5 billion.
Membership fees are commensurate.
One newspaper account of Davos described the
plethora of Audis and armoured limousines the elite of the world attend in while
discussing how to combat poverty and inequality. Many of the meetings aren't
public. Protests of the World Economic Forum try to attract attention to the
movers and shakers getting ready access without the bother of registering as
lobbyists to the political leaders but the valley where Davos is nestled has
tight security so protests are often held elsewhere such as in
Geneva.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
LETTERS TO
EDITOR
Subject: Ontario
Federation of Agriculture Vol. 16 No. 9 January 23,
2012
Dear Colin
Concerning the environmental record of the
general farming associations: The Ontario Federation of Agriculture is not the
only agricultural group though better publicised. I cannot speak for the
Christian Farmers but the National Farmers Union takes stewardship of the land
seriously and contains large numbers of organic farmers. The NFU is also
consulting with the urban vegetable gardeners, ground and rooftop, concerning
joining the union.
best
Jessie Davidson
GallonLetter notes: In Ontario, to be a legal
farm entity, farms must gross $7,000 in sales, have a valid Farm Registration
Number and pay a membership fee to one of the three General Farm
Organizations. This gives farm businesses reduced farmland property taxes at 25%
of the municipal residential tax rates and provides access to loans, grants,
farm income stability programs and other government programs.
******
Subject: Collective
Cooking
Regards,
Wendy
Wendy Priesnitz, Editor
Life Media
Publishers of The Alternate Press
Books,
Natural Life Magazine,
Natural Child Magazine, and
Life Learning Magazine
****************************************************
EUEC:
INSURANCE POLICY
A number of sessions at the EUEC 2012, Energy,
Utility and Environment Conference held in Phoenix, Arizona. January 30-February
1, 2012.were on risk management. The track was Operations and Management with
the focus on benchmarking hazard communication, spill prevention, hazardous
materials handling and safety measures that secure a power plant.
One of the topics was "Issues to Consider in
Your 2012 Insurance Renewal", a presentation by Vivek Chopra, Partner in the
Washington, DC law firm Perkins Coie LLP who represents utilities,
pharmaceutical companies and others against insurance companies. While the talk
related to US insurance and environmental law, the advice was pertinent to other
industry and business sectors. Some of the issues mentioned
include:
- Value insurance policies as assets which
temper a loss. Use the approaching renewal as a time to reevaluate all aspects
of the insurance including changed circumstances such as new acquisitions,
risks and assets to ensure the policy still meets the company's needs. Chopra
suggested this is as akin to checking the batteries of the smoke alarms at
dates of changes of daylight saving time. If the company suffers a
catastrophic loss, assume that the insurer will do everything to avoid
paying.
- Set a records management policy which
excludes old insurance policies from the shredder. The policy could be years
old and still provide coverage.
- Maintain your insurance
- Track claims and claim amounts on all the
policies over the years.
- Don't assume the insurance policy doesn't
cover a loss. Chopra mentioned a court case in which the court had decided a
US Environmental Protection Agency order to retrofit a facility due to
accedences in emissions, not usually considered damages, was covered by the
company's insurance policy.
Chopra also discussed pitfalls in other areas
including companies buying insurance under what are called Bermuda policies,
getting faulty additional insured certificates when working with contractors who
in turn work with subcontractors, not realizing that common insurance terms such
as "property damage caused by an occurrence" fails to cover faulty workmanship,
and common exclusions of damage such as of land structures such as retaining
walls and of secondary impacts e.g. the collapsing water tank may be insured but
the damage it causes when it falls may not be.
GallonLetter's editor was the co-chair and
presenter at one of the sessions, Sustainability Reporting, on the
Sustainability Track. We'll report more on EUEC next issue.
****************************************************
STEPHAN
SCMIDHEINY: ETERNIT
The decision in Turin, Italy on February 13,
2012 which sentenced Stephan Schmidheiny and Jean-Louis de Cartier de Marchienne
to prison for their role in exposure of Italian victims to asbestos may seem
monumental to the victims but by the time the defendants wend their way through
appeals may change. The fact that the court was so definitive about the criminal
charges may make civil suits more viable. Whether the case should give hope to
those seeking to have Canada stop the sale of asbestos to poor countries isn't
clear but the decision does help to frame some thoughts about what crime is:
that injuring and killing people over their lifetime is a crime.
GallonLetter has written previously about
Schmidheiny and some of the growing critics of the asbestos industry, Eternit
his company, and him in particular. He was an early proponent of greening
corporations yet sold a harmful product. Knowledge of the damage asbestos can
cause has been known for more than 50 years. Asbestos made him and his family
extremely rich. Forbes magazine estimated his wealth to be $3.2 billion in 2006.
As happens so often in the history of devastating pollution, companies win by
long delays before their product is restricted or banned. (see SCHMIDHEINY:
CHANGING COURSE GL Vol. 13, No. 5, June 9, 2008)
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
ROM: MAYA
EXHIBIT
The Maya Exhibit at the Royal Ontario Museum
(Toronto, Ontario) raises questions about how civilizations survive for a long
time although the answers about sustainability aren't all that clear. City
states such as Palenque at the foot of highlands in Chiapas, Mexico lasted over
a thousand years with a peak population of under 7,000. However, as many as five
million farmers were spread through the countrysides around the
cities.
Whether there actually was a Mayan Collapse is
unknown but the last glyphs (a combination of art and hieroglyphics) found on
artifacts in the city were dated January, 909 CE (The ROM uses Common Era to
describe the same period as AD). When the first European visited Palenque in
1567, the city with its stone temples, palaces and ball courts was taken over by
jungle and even today only a small percentage has been excavated.
In the exhibit video about the end of the
Classic Mayan era, one interpreter said reasons for "collapse" included the
erosion of the king's power. The king spent a lot of effort legitimizing his
claim to god-like status and was supposed to intervene with the gods on behalf
of humans but a long term drought may have undermined the faith of the largely
agrarian society in their sun king.
The city was entirely reliant on peasants who
lived outside the city and developed various farming systems beyond slash and
burn combined with hunting and gathering. They had no big meat animals but had
domesticated dogs, turkeys, muscovy ducks, and stingless bees for honey with
fields growing both annual and perennials plants including fruit trees, chili
peppers, tomatoes and yams.
The increase in demand of the nobles who lived
in the city with the king increased the resource demand so this might have been
an early example of the 1% demanding too large a share from the 99% who produced
their goods/food for them, according to the interpreter, who suggested that
perhaps the peasants supplying the food walked away. Coastal Mayan cities such
as Chichen Itza thrived into the 10th and 11th centuries. The trade routes had
changed as ships began to trade in coastal areas. The Mayans had no draught
animals, no wheels for carts and no sails, only dugout canoes for water
transport. Gold became a valuable trade item; the Mayans had obsidian (a
volcanic glass-like rock), but no metals.
Whether the collapse/decline was due to
climate change (cooling), overpopulation, war (the Mayans could mostly only
fight with neighbours they could walk or paddle to), environmental
degradation, drought, shifting trade routes, diseases and parasites common in
lowland regions, or rejection of the long held belief system is speculation but
it gives one pause to reflect. Aside from thinking about our own civilization
when speculating about the disappearance of past ones, the Mayan people then
survived under very tricky conditions for a long time with very little
technology and little variety of materials, which most of us now would think
impossible for a sophisticated and creative civilization. The city states may
have disappeared but the millions of Mayan people of today are featured at the
conclusion under the banner, "We are not myths of the past, ruins in jungles or
zoos. We are people."
The ROM curators are particularly skilled at
selecting the number of artifacts just short of overwhelming and placing them
with explanations, touching of replicas, models of city architecture and videos
in context to allow the visitor to gain maximum understanding. Fantastic
exhibit. And if you go, the exhibit explains what the Mayan calendar really says
about 2012 as the end of days.
Royal Ontario Museum. Maya: Secrets of their
ancient world. A mighty civilization, a mysterious people, a mythical past.
Until April 9, 2012. http://www.rom.on.ca/maya/visit/
****************************************************
GRAND CANYON
NATIONAL PARK: STOPS SELLING DISPOSABLE BOTTLED WATER
The Grand Canyon National Park in Colorado
announced on February 6, 2012 that the in-park sale of water packaged in
individual disposable containers less than one gallon including bottles and
boxes will be eliminated.
The park press release says there has been
increased litter not only along the rim of the Grand Canyon but also within the
mile (1.6 km) deep canyon where "adventurous and hardy persons" like hikers,
rafters and mule riders walk/climb/ride and paddle. Packing water is essential
to survival. During the summer, the temperatures are so high in the Grand
Canyon, that it is recommended that hikers avoid the trails between 10 am and
4pm.
Disposable plastic bottles comprise 20% of the
Grand Canyon's waste and 30% of the park's recyclables. The information doesn't
specify how many of the plastic bottles littered are water bottles as opposed to
soft drink bottles nor do the statistics specify how many of the bottles are
ones sold by the park concessions as opposed to those brought in from
elsewhere.
Many of the five million people who view this
spectacle of nature do so from their cars on the south rim although some areas
are only accessible by parking the car and taking shuttle buses to more
crowded places. In the heat of the summer, it would be inadvisable to
travel through deserts in this areas without carrying sufficient liquids. Years
ago, before GallonLetter's editor learned this lesson, he almost ran out of fuel
in the middle of a lot of sand and cactus in this part of the world; except for
a pair of binoculars which showed the correct direction to turn towards
civilization and gas, he would have found out just how inadvisable travelling
without water here was.
Of course, the water carried could be in a
reusable container but many people are just as likely to be bringing beverages
in disposable containers and for reasons which we here at GallonLetter can never
understand, feel free to throw the empty bottles out the car window while they
are marvelling at what is truly one of the wonders of the world.
The concessions will sell Grand Canyon
souvenir reusable water bottles. for $1.99 as well as soft drinks in disposable
containers. GallonLetter wonders how many more sales there will be of soft
drinks and of drinks which resemble water resulting in a continuing litter of
plastic bottles and other waste.(1)
National Park
Service Priority: Recycling
The National Park Service Director sent a memo
in December 2011 promoting sustainability in the National Park Service. under
the Green Parks Plan. The memo encouraged reduction and recycling of disposable
plastic water bottles with a priority on recycling . Ample and well-designed and
marked recycling facilities are the top priority because, "banning the sale of
water bottles in national parks has great symbolism but runs counter to our
health food initiative as it eliminated the healthiest choice for bottled
drinks, leaving sugary drinks as a primary alternative. A ban could pose
challenges for diabetics and others with health issues who come to a park
expecting bottled water to be readily available."
The memo, however, does allow park
superintendents to halt the sale of drinking water bottles if they complete a
rigorous impact analysis including an assessment of the effects on visitor
health and safety and obtain the approval of their Regional Director. The memo
outlines what is required in an assessment including availability of water
refill stations and impact on concessions operating in the park.
(1) The Bottled Water Guide in Chicago where
separate taxes apply to both bottled water and soft drinks, the following are a
partial list of beverages some of which we might consider water but are exempt
from the bottled water tax:
"1. Any beverage that qualifies as a “Soft
Drink” per the Chicago Soft Drink Tax ordinance.
2. Pedialyte
3. Gatorade
4. Vitamin Water
5. Sobe Life Water
6. Propel Fitness Water
7. Water Joe
8. Perrier, Seltzer Water, Club Soda or Tonic
Water
9. Mineral water (as defined by the
FDA)
10. Distilled water
11. Other products similar to those listed
above due to carbonation and/or other features such as
flavoring, vitamins, caffeine, or nutritional
additives.
12. Water provided by home or business water
delivery services, where the water is delivered in a reusable container that is
not sold with the water. The list above is not considered all
inclusive.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
KAHNEMAN:
THINKING, FAST AND SLOW
One of the essential ideas of capitalism is
that people make decisions based on the "utility" of their choice, implying that
people make rational decisions such as paying higher prices for something they
put at higher value.. In conventional economic theory, utility means everybody
wins through an efficient market where the companies supplying the demands are
successful and those paying are happy. This is also the basis of libertarian
philosophy: where government are seen as interfering with what anybody is free
to choose. GallonLetter notes that this freedom to choose includes degrading the
planet so such a degree that future generation may have relatively less freedom
to make choices for their own wellbeing.
In the book, Thinking, Fast and Slow,
psychologist Daniel Kahneman talks about the many mistakes people make with
their choices in the context of uncertainty, mistakes that will be detrimental
to their future wellbeing. The freedom to choose turns out in many cases to be
the freedom to suffer, to be poorer, to get ripped off or to vote on policy
which the voters might not have supported if the issue were framed differently
or if they weren't primed. For example, experiment participants primed by
messages about crime also tended to favour more authoritarian policy.
Libertarians and economist theorists may be happy with that but Kahneman writes,
"Freedom is not a contested value...But life is more complex for behavioural
economists than for true believers in human rationality."
Kahneman has been Eugene Higgins Professor of
Psychology and professor of public affairs in the Woodrow Wilson School of
Public and International Affairs at Princeton University since 1993 (and even
spent some time at the University of British Columbia.)
He details how humans take shortcuts which
result in choices which ignore basic statistical probability. This combination
of psychology and economics won him the 2002 Noble Prize for Economics for the
theory called prospect theory which identifies the many illusions and delusions
with which people deceive themselves (and others).
Humans are said to have two approaches to
thinking, System 1 is fast or intuitive thinking. System 2 is slower, both
monitors and is influenced by System 1 and tries to control but has limited
resources. Human evolution means that System 1 is always on duty while
activating System 2 to override the first fast thought is difficult work for the
mind. For many activities in daily life, driving on automatic so to speak
results in fine results but the top-of-mind reaction can also lead to costly,
painful, and even deadly mistakes due to lack of more careful consideration of
the facts of reality and the evidence. Some experts (but it seems not as many as
think they are experts) can reach the right conclusion using intuition e.g.
chess masters.
Try this question to test your
Systems:
1. A bat and ball cost $1.10
2. The bat costs one dollar more than the
ball.
3.How much does the ball cost?
(1)
There are many illusions, fallacies, and
biases described. Participants in experiments see losing as more adverse than
winning. To avoid the feeling of loss, people will make a choice which looks
like a win even though it leaves them worse off. People focus on one specific
factor ignoring many other factors which might have even more impact. The
mistake in focus is further elaborated as the erroneous belief of WYSIAT (What
you see is all there is). The focussing illusion ignores time as one of the
important factor so it creates a bias for a short period of intense joy rather
than a choice for a long time of moderate happiness. This is said to favour
consumption such as buying a new car over regular social gatherings or learning
the cello which require more effort. Kahneman has made a study of these issues
and still says "As I know, System 1 is not readily educable...My inquisitive
thinking is just as prone to overconfidence, extreme predictions, and the
planning fallacy."(2)
Chapter 24:
the Engine of Capitalism
Among the observations Kahneman makes in this
chapter include some business delusions.:
Optimistic Bias: Most of us view the world as
more benign that it really is. We tend to see our own attributes in a more
positive light than they are, for example, 90% of drivers think they are better
than the average, a statistical impossibility and our goals as more achievable
than they really are. As a mild delusion, optimistic bias which is basically an
emotional response can be positive because the optimist will make more effort to
succeed or as the saying goes, “They can because they think they
can.”
However, optimism also leads people to make
the wrong decisions. Although the chance of a small business surviving for five
years in the U.S. is about 35%, in a survey, 81% said their personal odds for
success were 70% and 33% said their chance of failure was zero. Misplaced
optimism leads to increased losses, "The evidence suggests that optimism is
widespread, stubborn and costly."
Companies with overconfident CEOs elevated by
the awards to celebrity status often get increased compensation underperform
possibly because the CEO spends more time giving interviews, writing books,
sitting on outside boards. There are many overconfident CFOs as well.
Organizations tend to penalize executives who admit that their forecasting of
markets is severely limited.
Competition Neglect: Businesses tend to
overestimate the contribution their skill makes to success and underestimate
luck; they have an illusion of control. They tend to make their plans without
much consideration of what others have in the way of skill and what others are
planning and doing. The focus is on what they know, not on what they don't know.
Kahneman found that when founders of companies were asked, "To what extent will
the outcome of your effort depend on what you do in your firm?", the answer was
invariably greater than 80%. The answer is usually wrong because the
achievements if its competitors and the changes in the market are very
important.
GallonLetter has called this the Fan Shop
phenomenon: at one time there was a huge number of shops dedicated to selling
ceiling fans. What happened was one shop opened selling ceiling fans which must
have sold very well, more competitors entered the market until there are so many
fan shops that nobody made any money and fan shops disappeared. However, a new
market has been signalled, so a competitor e.g building supply stores started
selling ceiling fans. The book describes the bankrupt firms as "optimistic
martyrs - good for the economy but bad for their investors." GallonLetter also
notes a fair number of optimistic green product providers who are super
enthusiastic about their product with no idea or interest to know what is
already available in the market.
Premortem
Only partial remedies may be available to deal
with overconfidence because the overconfidence is based on the subjective story
which one tells oneself not the evidence ie the quality and amount of
information supporting the choices. One approach is the premorten, conducted
when the company has nearly come to a decision but hasn't committed to it yet.
Individuals knowledgeable about the decision are asked to respond to the
question, "Imagine that we are a year in the future. We implemented the plan as
it now exists. The outcome was a disaster. Please take 5 to 10 minutes to write
a brief history of the disaster." At this stage, those who have objections don't
risk as much in expressing doubt about the wisdom of the plan as they would if
the leader signalled a decision had been made in which case only supporters of
the decision are likely to voice their views. Kahneman says there still may be
nasty surprises on the plan but this method encourages even supporters to think
about repercussions.
Organizations:
Role to Improve Decision-making
Organizations have the ability to think more
slowly and use orderly procedures such as checklists, framing of problems to
include broader factors, exercises such as review and to maintain routine
quality control on judgements and the decision product. using vocabulary to
encourage "a culture in which people watch out for one another as they approach
minefields." He concludes: "There is much to be done to improve decision-making.
" GallonLetter notes that the Chartered Accountants of Canada recently issued a
good example of how to go about this with a bulletin on the topic of
professional scepticism.
Although this book is particularly engaging
when it asks the reader to answer the same questions that the participants in
experiments are asked and showing how often these answers are wrong due to
participants failing to check, there are so many types of jumping to conclusions
even on what are relatively simple concepts that the book adds to GallonLetter's
feelings of depression that humanity might not have the ability to get its
collective mind around solving some of the very big environmental problems we
are facing. On the other hand, the book also shows ways in which we can become
more aware of minefields so as to make better decisions. A singularly important
point made: "You should not let yourself believe whatever comes to your mind."
It is certainly a good sign that it has been on non-fiction bestseller lists
such as Macleans and the New York Times for a number of months. There is room
for optimism yet.
Notes: (1) More than 50% of students tested at
Harvard and Princeton got the answer wrong. At other universities, the wrong
answer was given by more than 80% of of the student participants in experiments.
The wrong answer is .10 cents. If the ball were .10 cents than the bat would be
$1.00 more than the ball so the bat would have to be $1.10 making the total
$1.20 not $1.10. The correct answer is the ball costs .05 cents; bat costs $1.05
making the total $1.10.
(2) The planning fallacy is an optimistic
illusion which predicts that plans are going to succeed based on the mindset
that the outcome is unrealistically close to best case scenarios. The decisions
affected by planning fallacy can be improved by looking at statistics of similar
cases. Errors are not always innocent e.g. cost overruns are often due to
deliberate underestimation of costs to get the plan approved and then later
escalating the costs which should have been any realistic plan in the first
place.
Paid subscribers see link to
original documents and references
here.
****************************************************
READING
GALLONDAILY
If you enjoy Gallon Environment Letter or find
it useful for your work or interests, may we recommend the GallonDaily report.
Found at http://www.gallondaily.com, GallonDaily provides short articles and reports on
topics of particular interest to green businesses and individuals interested in
green business. One article appears almost every day Monday to Friday - we
recommend visiting at least once a week. Real enthusiasts can also sign up for
email notification as new articles are posted.
Recent topics include:
- Environmentalists agree to offset plan from
fertilizer giant
- Excellent analysis of Ontario’s renewable FIT
program
- PFOA from popcorn and non-stick coatings may
inhibit effectiveness of vaccines
- Investors urge company action on climate
change
- Failure to report costs chemical company huge
fine
- Ontario’s Drummond Report an Environment and
Sustainable Development Bust
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Copyright © Canadian Institute for Business
and the Environment
119 Concession 6 Rd Fisherville ON N0A 1G0
Canada. Fisherville & Toronto
All rights reserved. The Gallon Environment
Letter (GL for short) presents information for general interest and does not
endorse products, companies or practices. Information including articles,
letters and guest columns may be from sources expressing opinions not shared by
the Canadian Institute for Business and the Environment. Readers must verify all
information for themselves before acting on it. Advertising or sponsorship of
one or more issues consistent with sustainable development goals is welcome and
identified as separate from editorial content. Subscriptions for organizations
$184 + HST = $207.92. For individuals (non-organizational emails and paid with
non-org funds please) $30 includes HST. Subscription includes 12 issues about a
year or more. http://www.cialgroup.com/subscription.htm
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx