THE GALLON ENVIRONMENT LETTER
Canadian
Institute for Business and the Environment
Fisherville,
Ontario, Canada
Tel. 416
410-0432, Fax: 416 362-5231
Vol. 13, No. 10, October 29, 2008
Special US Election Issue
Honoured Reader Edition
****************************************************
This is the honoured reader
edition of the Gallon Environment Letter and is distributed
at no charge: send a note with Add GL or Delete GL in the
subject line to subscriptions@gallonletter.ca.
See below for One-Time Revamp of Our Mailing List. Subscribers
receive a more complete edition without subscription reminders
and with extensive links to further information following
almost every article. Organizational subscriptions are $184
plus GST and provide additional benefits detailed on the web
site. Individual subscriptions are only $30 (personal emails/funds
only please) including GST. If you would like to subscribe
please visit http://www.cialgroup.com/subscription.htm
If you feel you should be receiving the paid subscriber edition
or have other subscriber questions please contact us also
at subscriptions@gallonletter.ca.
This current free edition is posted on the web site about
a week or so after its issue at http://www.cialgroup.com/whatsnew.htm.
See also events of external organizations at http://www.cialgroup.com/events.htm
Back free editions from January 2007 are available at http://www.cialgroup.com/whatsnew-a.htm
***************************************************
IF YOU ARE AN
HONOURED READER PLEASE REREGISTER NOW
As part of our re-launch as a twice-monthly publication
we are revamping our Honoured Reader (free) mailing list. Honoured Readers will
continue to receive a no-cost edition of Gallon Environment Letter though the
content may be slightly less than the content in our paid subscriber editions.
In an attempt to reduce the vast amounts of spam email we receive we are asking
all Honoured Readers who have not already done so to re-register to continue
to receive Gallon Environment Letter. You can do this very quickly by clicking
here.
The reregistration task will take about 60 seconds. Honoured Readers who do
not reregister by January 7, 2009 will be dropped from the emailing list.
Thank you for your cooperation.
If you are not an Honoured Reader but see this
copy of Gallon Environment Letter on our website or through a forward from a
friend you may order your own Honoured Reader {free} edition of Gallon Environment
Letter by clicking here,
We hope you enjoy it.
Please note that all Honoured Reader subscription
information is covered by our Privacy Policy which states that we share your
subscription information with absolutely no other person or organization. You
will receive one or two copies of the Honoured Reader edition of Gallon Environment
Letter each month. Occasionally, no more than four times per year, we may also
send you information about other environment or Sustainable Development products
and services which we believe may be of interest to many of our readers.
****************************************************
ABOUT THIS ISSUE
Whether the winner is "drill, baby, drill",
the McCain war cry for more oil, or Obama’s "Clean Energy Economy", the United
States election has the potential to change the world. Gallon Environment Letter
wondered how much the candidates’ environmental and sustainability policies are
really a change from the past. In this issue we focus exclusively on the US
election, summarizing the energy, environment and sustainability components of
the Presidential candidates' platforms and briefly reviewing some of the
advocates’ views and other relevant issues. Also of interest are the
Propositions, those uniquely American citizen-initiated referenda that quite
often highlight future government directions at the state and national level.
Just as we were preparing to distribute this
issue, the current week’s International Edition of the second largest US news
magazine, Newsweek, appeared with a cover story "the Green Rescue - Why Obama,
Brown, Sarkozy and other world leaders are pushing a green solution to the
economic crisis". Unfortunately the US edition of the same magazine led with a
cover story by Richard N. Haass, President of the Council on Foreign Relations,
about the issues facing the next President that made only scant reference to the
greening of America, though it did include the rather weak statement "We can
offer tax breaks and subsidies as long as they are linked to greater efficiency
and 'greenness.' We should devote resources to the development of [energy]
alternatives, although resources will be in short supply and developing
alternatives will take time." For some reason, Newsweek, a generally slightly
liberal publication, felt that its American readers do not need to know that
green policies are being adopted almost everywhere else.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
US ELECTION 2008 AND THE ENVIRONMENT
****************************************************
THE US
ELECTION: AN ODD APPROACH TO DEMOCRACY
On November 4, US citizens will elect their
44th president, the 47th vice president, as well as federal, state and local
legislators. Eleven states and two territories are holding gubernatorial
elections. Thirty-three of the 100 senators are running for seats and 440
members of the House of Representatives will be elected. Voters will also decide
on propositions which are part of the ballot in a number of states.
Voters indirectly vote for the president by
casting their vote for members of the Electoral College who make the ultimate
decision on the winning presidential/vice-president pair. Electors are party
members who have pledged their vote to a specific candidate. In most cases, the
winner of the popular vote receives all the votes of the state. Forty-eight
states have a winner takes all rule; Nebraska and Maine allocate the elector
votes proportionally. Electors are not
required to honour their pledge but have ignored the popular vote only four
times (1824, 1876, 1888, 2000) The system makes it very difficult for third
parties to gain any foothold. The ballot may list the president/vice-president
ticket with or without the elector's name. The Electoral College has 538 votes
and the winner will require a majority (270 votes) in a December 15 ballot. The
President of the Senate counts the vote out-loud at a joint session of Congress
on January 6, 2009. The new President takes office January 20,
2009.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
ENERGY: THE
PRICE OF BEING GREEN
Avery Palmer, Environmental Reporter for
Congressional Quarterly, writes that in addition to economic issues, "The next
president will be confronting a staggeringly complex environmental problem:
global climate change." Among the challenges are choosing appropriate policies
to encourage renewable energy, biofuels and energy efficiency technologies. A
controversial issue is federal mandates for alternative fuels. A review of the
transportation policy next year as Congress discusses a new highway bill will
cause environmentalists to demand a greater share of funds for public transit.*
But the biggest challenge will be to set out a long term strategy when the
public is worried about high fuel prices. According to David Jenkin, government
affairs diretor of the group Republicans for Environmental Protection, “If
people really understand the energy dynamic that we face, they understand that
reducing our dependence on fossil fuels in the long term is really the way to
reduce our energy prices.”
Both McCain and Obama have promised a cap on
greenhouse gas emissions, "a complete reversal from the Bush Administration."
However, pricing greenhouse gas emissions will be politically very difficult to
do as critics will say that raising energy prices is the road to economic
disaster and a public afraid of higher fuel prices is unlikely to value the
benefits achieved a few decades away. When the Senate discussed global warming
bills this summer, the Bush Administration raised the spectre of more cost to
fill the car tank even though the increase in price would have only been 53
cents a gallon by 2020, a small portion of the increase likely to be caused by
higher oil prices. The impact on electricity costs would be higher but could be
reduced through energy efficiency and conservation. The only way a mandated
federal cap-and-trade plan will make it through Congress is an integration of
oil security with climate change policy which achieves economic benefits.
However, the regional interests such as coal in the Appalachian and oil drilling
in the Gulf of Mexico are political drivers which push back against a low-carbon
future. Both presidential candidates have clean coal in their platform but there
has been little success in carbon capture and storage technologies.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
MCCAIN-PALIN:
ENERGY THE LEXINGTON PROJECT
While Obama and Biden seem to be at least
compatible on their positions on energy-environment, John McCain and Sarah Palin
differ. A Time magazine article contrasts McCain, one of the first Republicans
to accept global warming caused by humans, with Palin. While McCain changed his
position to now support offshore oil drilling, he remains opposed to exploration
and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. His running mate supports
opening up the ANWR to oil and gas exploration and isn't inclined to attribute
global warming to man-made causes. Even President George W. Bush now says the US
has to do something to reduce danger due to human-caused global warming. When
the US Department of the Interior declared the polar bear as a threatened
species due to climate change, Palin initiated a lawsuit. However, as Governor
of Alaska, she signed an order setting up the Climate Change Sub-Cabinet to
recommend policies and measures to guide the state on adaptation and mitigation.
Alaska is also an observer to the Western Climate Initiative.
McCain is very supportive for free
trade.
The energy project is a patriotic one with a
goal of strategic energy independence by 2025. It is "named for the town where
Americans asserted their independence once before." Among the platform issues
are:
- Expanding domestic oil and natural gas exploration
and production: Lift the current federal moratorium on drilling in the Outer
Continental Shelf because it stands in the way of energy exploration and production.
Instead of spending hundreds of billions of dollars to buy foreign oil from
hostile and unstable suppliers, tapping these reserves can save trillions
of exported dollars. Forty-one percent of the US trade deficit is due to imported
oil. The reserve of recoverable natural gas is estimated to be 77 trillion
cubic feet.
- Commit $2 billion annually to advancing clean
coal technologies. Coal produces the majority of the US electricity currently. Viable
clean coal technologies may be over 15 years away but federal funds for science,
research and development can shorten this time. The technologies will be welcomed
in other countries such as China which rely heavily on coal. .
- Construct 45 new nuclear power plants by 2030
with the ultimate goal of eventually constructing 100 new plants. Currently,
nuclear power produces 20% of the nation's power, but the U.S. has not begun
construction on a new nuclear power plant in over three decades. The U.S.
should build the components for these plants and reactors domestically.
- A permanent tax credit equal to 10 percent
of wages spent on R&D to simplify the tax code, reward activity in the
U.S., and increase competition.
- Encourage the market for alternative, low carbon
fuels such as wind, hydro and solar power. According to the Department of
Energy, wind could provide as much as one-fifth of electricity by 2030. The
U.S. solar energy industry continued its double-digit annual growth rate in
2006. Instead of the patchwork of temporary tax credits, provide an even-handed
system of tax credits that will remain in place until the market transforms
sufficiently to the point where renewable energy no longer merits the taxpayers'
dollars.
Change how the US powers the transport
sector:
- Clean Car
Challenge: a single $5,000 tax credit for each and every customer who buys a
zero carbon emission car, an incentive to automakers. A graduated tax credit
will apply so that the lower the carbon emissions, the higher the tax
credit.
- A $300 million prize should be awarded for
the development of a battery package that has the size, capacity, cost and
power to leapfrog the commercially available plug-in hybrids or electric cars.
That battery should deliver a power source at 30 percent of the current
costs.
- Flex-Fuel Vehicles (FFVs), American
automakers have committed to make 50 percent of their cars FFVs by 2012. John
McCain calls on automakers to make a more rapid and complete switch to FFVs.
Brazil increased its new cars sales from 5 percent FFVs to over 70 percent of
new vehicles.
- Recognize the potential in the second
generation of alcohol-based fuels like cellulosic ethanol, which is said not
to compete with food crops,
- Level the playing field and eliminate
mandates, subsidies, tariffs and price supports that focus exclusively on
corn-based ethanol and prevent the development of market-based solutions which
would provide better options for fuel needs.
- Enforce existing CAFÉ standards -. the
mileage requirements that automobile manufacturers' cars must meet. Some
carmakers ignore these standards, pay a small financial penalty, and add it to
the price of their cars. The penalties must be such that carmakers produce
fuel-efficient vehicles.
Investing in clean, alternative sources of
energy
- The U.S. must become a leader in a new
international green economy creating green jobs by developing and deploying
new green technologies.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.l
****************************************************
MCCAIN-PALIN:
ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE
The principles of the Climate Policy are
listed as:
- Climate policy should be built on
scientifically-sound, mandatory emission reduction targets and
timetables.
- Climate policy should utilize a market-based
cap and trade system.
- Climate policy must include mechanisms to
minimize costs and work effectively with other markets.
- Climate policy must spur the development and
deployment of advanced technology.
- Climate policy must facilitate international
efforts to solve the problem.
The issues in the platform are:
Greenhouse gas emission targets and
timetables:
2012: Return Emissions To 2005 Levels (18
Percent Above 1990 Levels)
2020: Return Emissions To 1990 Levels (15
Percent Below 2005 Levels)
2030: 22 Percent Below 1990 Levels (34 Percent
Below 2005 Levels)
2050: 60 Percent Below 1990 Levels (66 Percent
Below 2005 Levels)
A cap-and-trade system that would set limits
on greenhouse gas emissions while encouraging the development of low-cost
compliance options. A climate cap-and-trade mechanism would set a limit on
greenhouse gas emissions and allow entities to buy and sell rights to emit,
similar to the successful acid rain trading program of the early 1990s. The key
feature of this mechanism is that it allows the market to decide and encourage
the lowest-cost compliance options.
- How does a cap-and-trade system work? A
cap-and-trade system harnesses human ingenuity in the pursuit of alternatives
to carbon-based fuels. Market participants are allotted total permits equal to
the cap on greenhouse gas emissions. If they can invent, improve, or acquire a
way to reduce their emissions, they can sell their extra permits for cash. The
profit motive will coordinate the efforts of venture capitalists, corporate
planners, entrepreneurs, and environmentalists on the common motive of
reducing emissions.
- The sectors covered would be electric power,
transportation fuels, commercial business, and industrial business - sectors
responsible for just under 90 percent of all emissions. Small businesses would
be exempt. Initially, participants would be allowed to either make their own
GHG reductions or purchase "offsets" - financial instruments representing a
reduction, avoidance, or sequestration of greenhouse gas emissions practised
by other activities, such as agriculture - to cover 100 percent of their
required reductions. Offsets would only be available through a program
dedicated to ensure that all offset GHG emission reductions are real, measured
and verifiable. The fraction of GHG emission reductions permitted via offsets
would decline over time.
Emissions permits will eventually be
auctioned:
- A portion of the funds raised will be used to
support a diversified portfolio of research and commercialization challenges,
ranging from carbon capture and sequestration, to nuclear power, to battery
development. Funds will also be used to provide financial backing for a Green
Innovation Financing and Transfer (GIFT) to facilitate
commercialization.
- A portion of auction proceeds will go to
reduce impacts on low-income American families.
Various measures will be used to reduce the
economic costs of meeting the emission targets
- The inherent structure of the program where
trading emission permits allows finding The Lowest-Cost Source Of Emission
Reductions.
- Permitting "banking" and "borrowing" of
permits so that emission reductions may be accelerated or deferred to more
economically efficient periods.
- Permitting unlimited initial offsets from
both domestic and international sources.
- Effectively integrating US trading with other
international markets, thereby providing access to low-cost permit
sources.
- Establishing a strategic carbon reserve as a
national source of permits during periods of economic duress.
- Early allocation of some emission permits not
auctioned..
- Climate Change Credit Corporation, the
public-private agency will oversee the cap and trade program, provide credit
to entities for reductions made before 2012, and ease transition for industry
with competitiveness concerns and fewer efficiency technology options.
- A commission will be convened to provide
recommendations on the percentage of allowances to be provided for free and
the percentage of allowances to be auctioned, and develop a schedule for
transition from allocated to maximum auctioned allowances. The cap-and-trade
system will also work to maximize the amount of allowances that are auctioned
off by 2050.
Promoting energy efficiency:
- Greening the federal government. The
government occupies 3.3 billion square feet of space worldwide and should lead
by example by applying a higher efficiency standard to new buildings leased or
purchased or retrofitting existing buildings. While taxpayers would save due
to energy cost savings, the purchasing would also develop the green
construction market.
- Electricity grid and metering improvements to
save energy. Reduce red tape to encourage investment to upgrade the national
grid including recharging the electric cars of the future. Deploy SmartMeter
technologies which provide customers information about energy use to encourage
a more cost-efficient use of power.
Speculation in energy. Reform the laws and
regulations governing the oil futures market, so that they are just as clear and
effective as the rules applied to stocks, bonds, and other financial
instruments.
A windfall profits tax has no place in the US
energy policy as it will hinder investment in domestic exploration. The windfall
tax put on by Jimmy Carter is said to have had little to no useful
results.
Development and deployment of advanced
technologies. Federal government research funding and infrastructure to support
the cap and trade emissions reduction goals and emphasize the commercialization
of low-carbon technologies. Government programs will be held more accountable to
meet commercialization goals and deadlines.
Leadership for effective international efforts
for a global solution to global climate change
- Actively engaging to lead United Nations
negotiations.
- Government incentives and partnerships for
sales of US clean tech to developing countries.
- Incentives for rapid participation by India
and China, while negotiating an agreement with each.
Climate change adaptation and mitigation
plans
- Adaptation should be based upon national and
regional scientific assessments of the impacts of climate change.
- Adaptation should focus on implementation at
the local level which is where impacts will manifest themselves.
- A comprehensive plan will address the full
range of issues: infrastructure, ecosystems, resource planning, and emergency
preparation.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
OBAMA-BIDEN:
PLAN FOR NEW ENERGY
The Obama-Biden platform Plan for New Energy
for America links energy, environment with economic, social and community
benefits. The climate change plan has a world view of assisting developing
countries and like John McCain's is eventually to be in cooperation with the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Obama even mentions
post-Kyoto which Canada's governing party failed to do in its recent election
platform. However, the US Democratic Party approach to promote American
technology as the climate change solution, is understandable but not always
appreciated by developing countries who want help to develop their own
technologies adapted to their circumstances and also to achieve their own
self-reliance so they don't have to pay license and support fees forever to the
rich world.
Obama shares an attitude with McCain in
wanting to have trade agreements which open up foreign markets to American
exports and jobs without much acknowledgement that trade is a partnership in
which both sides need to benefit. However, one of the criteria he applies is
labour and environmental components for the trade agreements. He wants to
renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement so it works for American
workers, call on the World Trade Organization to prevent government subsidies to
foreign suppliers and non-tariff barriers, extend trade adjustment assistance to
service sector workers, end tax deductions for companies claiming costs for
moving their operations overseas, seek to award public contracts to companies
employing American workers and give tax credits to those who increase the number
of American workers relative to those outside the US, maintain US headquarters
if it has been in the US, pay decent wages, provide health insurance and support
employees formerly in the military.
The energy platform includes:
- National goal on energy efficiency: Energy
efficiency is the cheapest, cleanest and fastest energy source. Goals include
reducing electricity demand 15 percent from the Department of Energy's
projected levels by 2020. This will save consumers $130 billion, reduce carbon
dioxide emissions by more than 5 billion tons through 2030 and create jobs.
Utilities will be required to meet annual demand reduction targets.
- Weatherize one million homes annually.
Upgrading home furnaces, sealing leaky ducts, fixing windows and adding
insulation can save low income families 20-40% of their energy bills with even
greater savings for energy efficient air conditioning, lighting and
appliances. About 5,5 million low-income homes have been weatherized since
1976 but more than 28 million are eligible under the existing program.
- Within 10 years save more oil than the US
currently imports from the Middle East and Venezuela combined.
- Put 1 million plug-in hybrid cars that can
get up to 150 miles per gallon on the road by 2015, cars that are to be built
in America. Specific focus will be R&D on advanced battery technology.
Within a year of taking office, the White House fleet will be converted to
plug-ins as security permits. By 2012, half of all cars purchased by the
federal government will be plug-in hybrids or all electric. Domestic
automakers and parts suppliers will receive $4 billion in retooling tax
credits and loan guarantees to produce the new fuel-efficient cars.
- Require all new vehicles to be flexible fuel
vehicles by the end of the first term in office.
- Develop the next generation of sustainable
biofuels and infrastructure including cellulosic ethanol, biobutenol and other
synthetic petroleum produced from sustainable feedstocks. The goal is 60
billion gallons of advanced biofuels by 2030.
- Establish a National Low Carbon Fuel Standard
which requires fuel suppliers beginning in 2010 to reduce the carbon of their
fuel by 5% within 5 years and 10 percent within 10 years. A sustainability
provision will ensure that biofuels expansion is not at the expense of
environmental conservation.
- Ensure 10 percent of electricity comes
from renewable sources such as solar, wind and geothermal by 2012, and 25
percent by 2025. This provides a national requirement already achieved in
various states. A federal Production Tax Credit for five years encourages the
trend towards renewable energy.
- Implement an economy-wide cap-and-trade
program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by
2050. All pollution credits will be by auction to ensure industry pays for
every ton of emission. A portion of the receipts ($15 billion per year) will
be used for development of clean energy, investment in energy efficiency
improvements and develop the next generation of biofuels and clean energy
vehicles. Some will be used for new funding for state restoration of habitat,
wildlife migration corridors and helping fish and wildlife adapt to climate
change. All other receipts will be used for rebates and transition relief for
families and communities impacted by a low carbon economy.
- Crack down on excessive energy speculation.
Close loopholes in Commodity Futures Trading regulations to increase
transparency and prevent traders lining their pockets.
- Increase fuel economy standards. Oil still
provides 96% of the energy for vehicles in the US. Increase fuel
efficiency standards by 4% each year while protecting the financial future of
domestic automakers.
- Release light crude from the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve and replace it with heavy crude for the longer term.
Increasing the supply will reduce the prices.
- Create a new $7,000 tax credit for purchasing
advanced vehicles.
- A “Use it or Lose It” approach to existing
oil and gas leases. Companies have access to 68 million land acres and 40
million offshore acres. If they don't drill their leases must be turned over
to those who will.
- Remove barriers for drilling in known areas
of large recoverable oil and unconventional natural gas in such areas as the
Bakken Shale in Montana and North Dakota. Get more from existing oil fields
through Enhanced Oil Recovery using carbon dioxide; an incentive will be given
to those emitters sending their CO2 to oil fields for EOR. Map all stationary
CO2 sources and develop a database so industry has the information for the
most cost-effective oil field for their CO2.
- Build more sustainable and liveable
communities; repairing roads and bridges, promote land use decisions and
development patterns which make it easier to walk, bike or use transit
including incentives by employers to encourage employees to use public
transit.
- Develop and deploy clean coal technology. The
Department of Energy is to enter into private-public partnerships on five
first-of-a-kind commercial scale coal-fired plants with carbon capture and
sequestration.
- Before nuclear power is expanded, key issues
must be addressed such as security of nuclear fuel and waste, waste storage
and proliferation. Yucca Mountain is not a suitable site and future efforts
will look for safe, long-term disposal. Waste stored at current reactor sites
must be stored using the most advanced dry-cask technology available.
- Prioritize the construction of the Alaska
Natural Gas Pipeline.
- Set national building efficiency goals. All
new buildings to be carbon neutral or produce zero emissions by 2030. New
building efficiency is to improve by 50% and existing building efficiency by
25% by 2030.
- Update backlogged appliance efficiency
standards.
- Reduce federal energy consumption. The
federal government is the world's largest single user of energy spending $14.5
billion on energy in FY 2008. Increase by 40% the efficiency in all new
federal buildings within five years and ensure all new federal buildings are
zero-emission by 2025. Invest in cost-effective retrofits to achieve a 25
percent increase in efficiency of existing federal buildings within five
years. Reduce federal energy consumption by 15% by 2015.
- Flip incentives for utilities so they profit
from reliability and performance rather than increased energy usage.
- Invest in a smart grid including advanced
technologies for managing peak load, smart metering, demand response,
distributed generation and electricity storage systems as well as
demonstration projects on power grid sensing, communications, analysis and
power flow control including integrating demand-side resources into grid
management.
5 million green collar jobs:
- Help create five million new jobs by
strategically investing $150 billion over the next ten years to catalyse
private efforts to build a clean energy future including commercialization of
plug-in hybrids, promote development of commercial scale renewable energy,
encourage energy efficiency, invest in low emissions coal plants, advance the
next generation of biofuels and fuel infrastructure and begin transition to a
new digital electricity grid. Also investment in training of manufacturing
workforce to develop skills and tools for green manufacturing.
- Green Vet Initiative: Provide funding to
support green jobs for veterans for counselling, job placement and working
with industry partners to provide education and career path development. There
are 837,000 troops who served in Iraq and Afghanistan
- Convert manufacturing into clean technology
leaders with a $1 billion per year investment, helping manufacturing centres
to modernize and help Americans gain the skills to produce green production.
Funding will be made available to the states to provide critical up-front
capital for small and mid-size manufacturers. The goal is to spur sustainable
economic growth in communities across the country.
- Increase funding for federal workforce
training programs for green technologies training such as advanced
manufacturing and weatherization training with the aim to create stable, high
paying jobs. Also a youth program for disadvantaged and disconnected youth to
provide skills and experience in improving energy efficiency in homes and
buildings while improving their opportunities for moving up the career
ladder.
Provide short-term relief to American families
facing pain at the pump.
- Oil company windfall profit to be used to
provide direct relief ($500 for individuals and $1000 for families) within
five years of the profit gain to help with rising costs of fuels, food and
other living expenses. Consideration for a second-generation funding for
weatherization and home heating assistance.
Make the US a leader on climate
change:
- All major emitting nations need to join in
the solution as part of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change but
America can lead as long as developing nations such as China and Brazil are
not far behind.
- Create a new forum of largest greenhouse gas
emitters, a Global Energy Forum – based on the G8+5, which includes all G-8
members plus Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa – comprised of the
largest energy consuming nations from both the developed and developing world,
which would focus exclusively on global energy and environmental issues. This
Global Energy Forum will complement – and ultimately merge with – the much
larger negotiation process underway at the UN to develop a post-Kyoto
framework.
- Transfer American technology to the
developing world to fight climate change: Create a Technology Transfer Program
within the Department of Energy dedicated to exporting climate-friendly
technologies, including green buildings, clean coal and advanced automobiles,
to developing countries to help them combat climate change.
- Confront deforestation and promote carbon
sequestration: A comprehensive strategy to combat global warming must address
tropical deforestation which accounts for approximately 20 percent of global
greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing rates of tropical deforestation will not
only slow greenhouse gas emissions but will also protect the livelihoods of
local people and the abundance of biodiversity inextricably linked to those
forests. By offering incentives to maintain forests and manage them
sustainably, the United States can play a leadership role in dealing with
climate change.
- Develop domestic incentives that reward
forest owners, farmers, and ranchers when they plant trees, restore
grasslands, or undertake farming practices that capture carbon dioxide from
the atmosphere.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
OBAMA-BIDEN:
PROMOTING A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT
The Democratic ticket environment platform
includes descriptions of Barack Obama's various initiatives as a Senator. The
details such as levels of funding and targets are more often less specific than
in the energy platform.
Among the environment commitments
are:
- Clean Technologies Deployment Venture Capital
Fund will partner with existing funds and the National Laboratories to move
technologies from the lab to commercialization in the U.S.
- Clean air: Restore the force of the Clean Air
Act, listen to scientific advisors and improve national clean air
standards.
- Reduce health risks from mercury pollution.
More than 5 million women in the US of childbearing age have high levels of
toxic mercury in their blood and 630,000 children are born every year at
risk.
- Clean water. Full funding for the Clean Water
State Revolving Fund, strengthen drinking water standards, protect the Great
Lakes, develop policies to help high-growth areas deal with managing water
supplies and restore federal funding for water and wastewater treatment
infrastructure.
- Regulate Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations CAFOs with tougher fines for violations and more control by local
communities.
- Restore wetlands including Wetland Reserve
Program in the Farm Bill, restoration of Gulf Coast wetlands, marshes and
barrier island, and close the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet which funnelled
floodwater into New Orleans,
- Great Lakes: push for the Great Lakes
Collaboration Implementation Act and the Great Lake Environmental Restoration
Act which funds wetland restoration, coastal wildlife and fisheries habitat
improvement. Obama opposed the Indiana approval to allow more polluting
emissions from a BP refinery.
- Water in the West: Federal policies to help
western communities save water including voluntary water banks, wastewater
treatment and other market-based conservation measures. Nevada's cash for
grass program is mentioned - people are paid to replace lawns with desert
landscaping.
- Healthier communities: reduce environmental
toxins through clean-up of brownfields, restoration of riverfront industrial
lands, tools for communities for healthier food and livable walkable
neighbourhoods.
- Reduce lead poisoning: About 400,000 children
are suffering from lead poisoning in the US.
- Protect the public from nuclear material
through requirements for reporting of accidental or unintentional leaks of
radioactive substance.
- Control Superfund Sites and Data: Require
polluters to pay for the cleanup of the contaminated sites they
created.
- Strengthen funding programs for environmental
justice so low income communities have the resources to address local
environmental problems and challenge laws and policies which adversely affect
the health of low-income and minority communities.
- Encourage organic and sustainable
agriculture. Increase the funding for the National Organic Certification
Cost-Share Program to help farmers afford the costs of compliance with
national organic certification standards. Reform the US Department of
Agriculture crop insurance program so they do not penalize organic
farmers.
- Support local family farmers with local foods
and promote regional food system policies. Implement USDA policies that
promote local and regional food systems and encourage Americans to Buy Fresh
and Buy Local.
- Encourage Farmers to use more wind and solar
and help their bottom line and the environment. Will support new irrigation
practices to save energy and water and use of methane digesters to produce
power from animal waste and practices such as no-till to save energy and
improve the health of soil.
- Protect National Parks and Forests: Do not
drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Implement Roadless Area
Conservation Rule to keep 58 million acres of national forests pristine.
Prohibit the importation of illegally harvested wood products to ensure
foreign companies do not deforest other areas of the world. Forests sequester
carbon.
- Conserve new land: Increase funding for Land
and Water Conservation Fund which supports land acquisition and maintenance of
parks. Acquire new land with a focus on ecosystems such as the Great Plains
and Eastern forests which lack an adequate level of protection.
- Partner with landowners to conserve private
land: Increase funding for the Conservation Security Program and Conservation
Reserve Program and will provide incentives for private landowners to protect
and restore wetlands, grasslands, forests and other wildlife
habitat.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
GRIST: COMPARE
THE CANDIDATES
Grist, the daily electronic US-based
environmental magazine, posted a chart comparing the candidates including Barack
Obama, John McCain, independent candidate Ralph Nader, Green candidate Cynthia
McKinney, and Libertarian Bob Barr. The listing is by seven
categories:
- Cap-and-trade program for greenhouse-gas
emissions
- Offshore drilling
- Fuel-economy standards for automobiles
- Renewable energy
- Biofuels
- Coal
- Nuclear energy
Additional links are provided to items in each
listing, to interviews and fact sheets. The
chart shows that while candidates may support certain actions not all have
targets and specific plans. For example, McCain is said to support renewables
and biofuels but has not offered specific targets for those.
Both McCain and Obama support a cap-and-trade
system. McCain favours allowing domestic and international offsets for
compliance. His target is 60% below 1990 levels by 2050 while Obama's is 80%.
McCain would give credits initially for free phasing in auctions over time while
Obama would auction all greenhouse gas emissions from the
beginning.
Nader supports a carbon tax with a target of
80% below 1990 levels by 2050 and would auction the credits starting at $50 per
ton of carbon dioxide equivalent.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
LEAGUE OF
CONSERVATION VOTERS:
2008 NATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD
The League of Conservation Voters rates
members of House of Representatives and the Senate on conservation and energy
issues. The latest scorecard was released October 17.
The group claims to be non-partisan and its
Dirty Dozen lists legislators from all parties with very low scores (e.g. career
lifetime scores of 4%, 7%, 14%, 43%). which LCV thinks could be turfed. The
group claims that this list has helped to oust a number of "undefeatable"
incumbents in the past. Voters are urged to "turn out the lights" on the Dirty
Dozen.
An Environmental Champions lists seeks to
protect vulnerable legislators who have a strong environmental record.
Republican Senator Susan Collins was endorsed in 2008 as the only Republican
with a Perfect Environmental Voting Record in 2007 who also kept commitment to
conservation and clean energy in 2008.
The LCV Lifetime Score for McCain is 24% and
Obama 86%. The LCV 2007 Score is 0% for McCain and 67% for Obama although that
is somewhat controversial because of the absences due to campaigning. The chart
on Global Warming gives LCV's position and the two major presidential
candidates. For example, LCV's position is a mandatory cap and 100% auction of
pollution permits which is supported by Obama. McCain supports the cap but has
no articulated position on auction.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
US CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE: ELECTION 2008
This is the most significant election in a
generation that Americans will vote in, according to Thomas Donohue, President
and CEO of the US Chamber of Commerce but climate change matters little it seems
- it is free trade that is the most important issue here.
US Chamber provides a chart of where the
candidates stand on key economic issues including environment issues. The US
Chamber of Commerce doesn't outright endorse a candidate but Chamber CEO Thomas
says to vote for free trade which is clearly John McCain although even McCain is
promising to set mandatory targets for greenhouse gas emissions, something to
which the Chamber is opposed.
The Chamber lists its priorities including the
environment and climate change for 2008. The climate change position
includes;
-
Oppose efforts to regulate
greenhouse gas emissions through existing environmental statutes including but
not limited to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species
act and the National Environmental Policy Act.
-
Ask Congress to delay action
on climate change until careful review.
-
Oppose any climate change
legislation unless it deals with five criteria: 1. address international
aspects, 2. promote accelerated technology development and deployment, 3.
preserve jobs and economy, 4. reduce barriers to climate-friendly energy and
5. promote energy efficiency measures.
-
Ensure that developing nations
share responsibility for climate change initiatives.
GL notes that it is typical of some industry
when opposed to action not to say so but instead to lobby for delay. So opposed
to mandatory climate change regulations, the industry achieves delays by a set
of criteria which must all be met. Of course, jobs and economy are essential but
a green economy might lead to the downfall of some industries while new ones
with less environmental impact develop. Essentially the delay means no or little
action could be taken. However, in the same priorities document is something the
Chamber member industries want - the free use of nanotechnology. Then the
wording is entirely different despite growing scientific concern that there is
much that is potentially hazardous and that society and government ought to take
a more precautionary approach to nanotechnology. Instead the industry position
is to:
- Advocate for commonsense legislation and
regulations where appropriate as well as federal research into the
environmental, health and safety implications of nanotechnology.
- Work to ensure that federal regulatory
agencies, particularly EPA implement a sensible regulatory structure that does
not handicap US leadership in the rapidly growing commercial area of
nanotechnology.
GL wonders where is the five point criteria
that must all be met on nanotechnology. The Chamber is the world's largest business
federation in the world with 3 million business and hundreds of associations
and chambers from many other countries as members. With 300 staff and an office
near the White House, it is a powerful lobby in Washington. The world is expected
to recover from the tsunami of economic crisis caused by quite a few leading
masterminds in business and complacent governments but the attitudes and actions
of these same groups of powerbrokers is predicted by the best science available
to lead to a tsunami of climate change from inaction for which there may be
no bailout at an affordable price or without a heavy cost of human lives.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
US CLIMATE
ACTION PARTNERSHIP
Some of the same companies which are lobbying
against action on climate change are also part of a coalition of ngos and
business in the United States Climate Action Partnership USCAP (see US Coal
Industry Leader Declares Boycotts as Fair Game GL V12 N7 July 9, 2007) to urge
the US government to quickly enact
legislation to significantly reduce greenhouse
emissions. This business group isn’t endorsing a presidential candidate either
but in an October press release endorsed action on climate change, “Given
current economic challenges, USCAP believes a sustainable environment is
inextricably linked to a strong economy where increased energy efficiency, new
technologies and wise energy infrastructure investments will create economic
opportunities. Our environmental goal and economic objectives can best be
accomplished through an economy-wide, market-driven approach to climate
protection that includes a cap-and-trade program that places specified limits on
greenhouse gas emissions. “
GL will review in a future issue the book
Earth: The Sequel in which Fred Krupp, President of the US Environmental Defense
Fund and EDF writer, Miriam Horn, describe how EDF changed from suing industry
to working with them in coalition including the USCAP.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
****************************************************
PROPOSITIONS
ON THE BALLOT
Some say that the proposition votes are direct
democracy as citizens can propose initiatives while others say the proposals
should be vetted by the legislature as so often the ballot proposes tax cuts or
new initiatives which divert money from higher priorities.
Some ballot questions are referendum items
referred from the state legislature or citizen proposals to overrule state
legislation already passed. For example, in Arkansas, a petition can be launched
against any measure passed in the General Assembly provided a certain percentage
ranging from 6-10% of voters depending on the nature of issue. State
constitution changes may require citizen votes. Some propositions are repeated
in various states so they are obviously a nationwide effort sometimes by
corporate interests, sometimes by other interests. Millions of dollars are spent
on some Yes or No campaigns for certain propositions.
Some of the ballot questions are subject to
lawsuits. For example, the titles or descriptions are said to be misleading or
the stated impacts said to be untrue. California's Proposition 2 on animal
welfare is the subject of complaints that money was directed from out-of-state
through the United Egg Producers contrary to California law. The Yes supporters
of the ballot question also complained that agricultural lobby groups funded the
University of California - Davis to produce a study concluding that the
Proposition would harm California's farms and raise egg prices.
There are propositions which seem to
favour environmental protection and those which do not and for which the
environmental implications are unclear.
Examples of environmentally related
propositions include:
Arkansas: A water, disposal and pollution
abatement facilities financing act to authorize $300 million in
bonds
Arizona: conserving Arizona's water and land:
a measure to permanently preserve and protect the most important natural areas
(580,000 acres) in Arizona; adds requirements for planning of state trust lands
and local community involvement in trust lands.
California: Safe, reliable high-speed
passenger train bond act. To provide alternatives to driving, to provide good
jobs and improve the state's economy while reducing air pollution, global
warming greenhouse gases and dependence on imported oil. Issue bonds for a 30
year state cost of $19.4 billion for principal and interest for a train service
from Southern California (Los Angeles), the Sacramento/San Joaquin Valley and
the San Francisco Bay Area. The train is for 220 mph service. Some taxpayer
groups are opposed saying that the train line would never be built.
Standards for confining animals initiative
statute. Beginning in 2015. the State would prohibit with certain exceptions the
confinement on a farm of pregnant pigs, calves raised for veal and egg-laying
hens which prevent them from turning around freely, from lying down, standing up
and fully extending their limbs. Some groups are opposed saying that it would
shut down egg producers and others so the food products would come from
elsewhere without these standards. Although the ballot questions mentions a
number of animal, the main issue is chicken laying eggs, which is a big industry
in California.
Renewable Energy Generation Initiative
Statute. Requires government owned utilities to generate 20% of their
electricity from renewable energy by 2010, currently applied to private
utilities, raise to 40% by 2020 and 50% by 2025. Currently a cost cap limits the
requirement to times when the cost is no more than 10% above the specified
market price for electricity. Opponents say that California already has
renewable energy requirements and the legislators should be the ones to decide
how to proceed next.
Alternative fuel vehicles and renewable energy
bonds, initiative statute: 4 billion in bonds to help consumers and other
purchase alternative fuel vehicles and fund research in renewable energy and
alternative fuel vehicles. Supporters say this will get polluting diesels off
the road and increase grants to California universities for research on cheaper
alternatives to gasoline. Critics say it is special interest legislation which
will divert funds from schools and critical services during a budget crisis.
Some also say that subsidies will be given to owners of vehicles using natural
gas which is a fossil fuel and that gas investors paid for signatures to put the
issue on the ballot.
Colorado: Severance taxes on the oil and
natural gas industry: measure eliminates a state tax credit (87% of the property
tax paid), increases the number of oil and gas wells subject to the tax (removal
of exemption on small wells) and changes the rate of severance tax which is paid
by companies to extract nonrenewable natural resources such as oil and gas,
gold, coal and molybdenum. Some of the additional funds are to be directed to a
college scholarship program, wildlife habitat, energy efficiency and renewable
clean energy , transportation project and small community drinking water and
domestic wastewater treatment projects.
Georgia: Forest Preservation through tax
reductions. The State's Constitution requires uniform taxation of the same class
so a proposal for special assessment and reduced property tax on forest land
under 15 year conservation covenants and compensation to local governments
requires a ballot question.
Louisiana: more severance taxes from oil and
gas companies to the Parishes where oil and gas activities are ongoing. These
activities take a toll on local infrastructure. Critics say the funds would go
to areas already benefiting economically due to the oil and gas activities and
restrict the state funds for general use. About $10 million annually are also
proposed for the Atchafalaya Basin Conservation fund. The Basin ((150 miles from
north to south and 20 miles across) in south central Louisiana is the largest
river swamp in the US with the largest bottomland hardwood forest. Of the
838,000 acres about 400,000 acres are publically owned.
Maine: $3.4 million bond issue to support
drinking water programs and wastewater treatment facilities
Missouri: Question requires utility companies
to use an increased amount of renewable energy.
Ohio: Clean Ohio Fund: a measure supported by
Gov. Ted Strickland and others. It would provide $400 million for environmental
conservation, preservation and revitalisation including environmental
clean-up.
The Water Compact: Ohio's legislature voted to
ratify the agreement along with Ontario and Quebec to reduce the diversion of
water from the Great Lakes. The compact will take effect whether or not the
voters support the amendment. The question includes property right protection so
owners of land have the right to reasonable use of the groundwater underlying
the property owner's land as well as use of water in a lake or watercourse
located on or flowing though the owner's riparian land. Regulation of such water
by the state is allowed. Does not apply to Lake Erie or navigable waters of the
state. The property rights issue was put on the ballot because Sen. Tim
Grendell, a Cleveland-area Republican, feared that the Great Lakes Compact would
put ownership of the water of the Great Lakes Basin including tributaries, wells
and groundwater into dispute.
Oklahoma: state constitutional amendment to
give everybody in the stat the right to hunt, trap, and take game and fish
subject to reasonable regulation. Hunting and fishing are to be the preferred
method for managing game and fish.
Rhode Island: Open Space - borrowing of $2.5
million to purchase or permanently protect through purchase of title to,
development rights, conservation easements and public recreation easements,
greenways and other open space, recreation land, forested lands and agricultural
lands
Transportation: Authorize the Rhode Island
state government to borrow $87 million for improvements to to the State's highways, roads and bridges, to fund
commuter rail and to purchase new buses and/or rehabilitate existing buses in
the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority's bus fleet.
Washington: open high-occupancy vehicle lanes
to all traffic, traffic light synchronization, fund traffic-flow
purposes.
Paid subscribers see links to original
documents and references here.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Copyright © Canadian Institute for Business
and the Environment
119 Concession 6 Rd Fisherville ON N0A 1G0
Canada. Fisherville & Toronto
All rights reserved. The Gallon Environment
Letter (GL for short) presents information for general interest and does not
endorse products, companies or practices. Information including articles,
letters and guest columns may be from sources expressing opinions not shared by
the Canadian Institute for Business and the Environment. Readers must verify all
information for themselves before acting on it. Advertising or sponsorship of
one or more issues consistent with sustainable development goals is welcome and
identified as separate from editorial content. Subscriptions for organizations
$184 + GST = $193.20. For individuals (non-organizational emails and paid with
non-org funds please) $30 includes GST. Issues about fifteen times a year with
supplements. http://www.cialgroup.com/subscription.htm
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx